Month: February 2016

Prominent Eyes, Negative Vector, Round Eyes and Infraorbital Rim Implants

26, February, 2016

The upper midface skeleton has direct and indirect influences on the appearance of the face and particularly, the eyes. The relationship between the eyeball and the orbital rims will determine if the eyes appear prominent or deep set. Because the infraorbital rim ( the bone directly beneath the eye) and upper midface skeleton support the […]

More

The Role of Anthropometry in Planning Aesthetic Surgery

23, February, 2016

Medical anthropometry is the collection of  precise, reproducible surface measurement of the human body. The late Leslie Farkas was a medical anthropologist who accumulated large numbers of surface measurements of various population groups of both sexes. These data defined normal values, as well as gender and ethnic differences in facial measurements and proportions. In my […]

More

The limited role of mathematical ideals in planning facial surgery.

19, February, 2016

When reconstructing a severely injured face after a motor vehicle accident, the plastic surgeon attempts to return the involved area to its original appearance, or, if that is not possible, to one that is symmetric and accepted as normal. When a patient desires their uninjured face to be made more attractive, the aesthetic goal is […]

More

Do fat grafts, fillers and facial implants have the same effect on facial appearance?

16, February, 2016

Fat grafts, fillers (usually hyaluronic acid) and facial implants all add volume to the face. But they do so in different ways and therefore, have different roles in improving facial appearance. Fat grafts and fillers are placed in the soft tissues of the face and are meant to add volume to the skin envelope. Facial […]

More

All Faces are Asymmetric – Recognizing and Treating Facial Asymmetry

12, February, 2016

All faces are asymmetric. Many are so insignificant to be never noticed, while those at the other end of the spectrum are deforming. Fortunately, asymmetries are usually subtle but, with sufficient scrutiny, detectable. Their recognition preoperatively is important to both the surgeon and the patient. The patient’s asymmetry should be pointed out during the preoperative […]

More

Why isn’t bone used to augment the facial skeleton?

09, February, 2016

In concept, autogenous bone (that is, bone borrowed from another part of one’s body) would be the best material to restore or improve the craniofacial skeleton, because it has the potential to be revascularized and, then, incorporated into the facial skeleton. In time, it could be biologically indistinguishable from the adjacent native skeleton. Practically, the […]

More

Who are candidates for facial implants?

05, February, 2016

Patients with normal, deficient, and surgically altered or traumatically deformed anatomy may all benefit from implant augmentation of their craniofacial skeleton. Most often, facial skeletal augmentation is done to enhance facial appearance in patients whose skeletal relationships are considered within the normal range. They want more definition and angularity to their appearance. Other patients desire […]

More

Dr. Yaremchuk- Invited faculty at the South Eastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, Atlanta Oculoplastic Symposium

05, February, 2016

Dr. Michael Yaremchuk was recently invited as faculty to the 9th Annual Atlanta Oculoplastic Symposium held at the Intercontinental Hotel, Atlanta, GA on January 21st, 2016. The Symposium was hosted by the South Eastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Dr. Yaremchuk has been a frequent lecturer and panelist at this symposium since its inception. […]

More